On the 24th of October last year the world hardly blinked as we reached 66 whole years of world government. The mainstream media downplay it’s existence. The so called truth movement are convinced it’s inevitable, and that the ‘NWO’ will bring not just a one world government but the added bonus of any of the following;
- Aliens
- WW3
- Some kind of religious apocalypse
- Reptilian world takeover
- Some other satanic brouhaha
All this, despite the fact that we ALREADY have a world government and have done so for the past 66 years! What am I missing here? The few hundred readers of this blog may recall my heavily sarcastic look at Wikipedia and the BBC’s nonsensical doctrines on the nuances of global governance. I feel that the point of that entry was missed by most. Here I shall attempt a much clearer synopsis.
I feel it always adds a sense of irony to start with Wikipedia. As I did in my original post concerning ‘one world government’. Let’s have a look at a map showing the member nations of the UN: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:United_Nations_Members.svg
There are currently 193 member states, including every internationally recognised sovereign state in the world but the Vatican City.
Next. As I breath a tiresome sigh…. Let’s go and ask, one final time, if we have a one world government. And before we get entangled in pointless bullshit surrounding terminology etc, by one world government I mean:
government
world
Do I need to be any clearer? A government of the world. Not to be confused with any bullshit political speak tomfoolery, ie “no but there’s a difference between global governance and blah blah blah”. Fuck that. I’m talking about a WORLD GOVERNMENT. Nothing more, nothing less.
What is the remit of government?
Let’s stick with the basics for now.
- To protect us
- Make economic decisions
- Provide public services
- Maintain social order
The following is the text of UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon’s message for the International Day of United Nations Peacekeepers, observed on 29 May:
The tragedies that have befallen United Nations peacekeepers already this year are a sobering reminder of the risks entailed in their important work for peace. As we mark the International Day of United Nations Peacekeepers, we pay tribute to the more than 120,000 military, police and civilians serving worldwide under the blue flag and remember those who lost their lives in the cause of peace. http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2011/sgsm13574.doc.htm
Ok. So we’ve got protection in the bag. No? Let’s take one more:
The United Nations Protection Force (UNPROFOR), was the first United Nations peacekeeping force in Croatia and in Bosnia and Herzegovina during theYugoslav wars. It existed between the beginning of UN involvement in February 1992, and its restructuring into other forces (United Nations Preventive Deployment Force – UNPREDEP) in March 1995.
The UNPROFOR was composed of nearly 39,000 personnel, 320 of whom were killed on duty. It was composed of troops from Argentina, Bangladesh, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Colombia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Egypt, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany , Ghana, India,
Indonesia, Ireland, Italy, Jordan, Kenya, Lithuania, Malaysia, Nepal, Netherlands, New Zealand, Nigeria, Norway,Pakistan, Poland, Portugal, the Russian Federation, Slovak Republic, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Tunisia, Turkey, Ukraine, the United Kingdom and the United States.
Let’s move on to economic decisions.
Statistical Commission
Fortieth session
24-27 February 2009Items for information: follow-up to Economic and
Social Council policy decisionsAction requested by the Economic and Social Council
1. In its resolution 2008/29 on the role of the Economic and Social Council in the
integrated and coordinated implementation of the outcomes of and follow-up to
major United Nations conferences and summits, in the light of relevant General
Assembly resolutions, including resolution 61/16 (E/2008/L.29 and E/2008/SR.43),
the Economic and Social Council reaffirmed the need to continue to strengthen the
Council as the central mechanism for system-wide coordination and thus promote
the integrated and coordinated implementation of and follow-up to the outcomes of
the major United Nations conferences in the economic, social and related fields, in
accordance with the Charter of the United Nations and relevant Assembly
resolutions, in particular resolutions 50/227, 57/270B and 61/16.http://unstats.un.org/unsd/statcom/doc09/2009-26-ECOSOCDecisions-E.pdf
What does that mean?
To answer that question we need to look at resolution 50/227 first.
Annex I
There is an urgent need to strive for the fulfilment of the agreed
target of 0.7 per cent of gross national product for official development
assistance as soon as possible. http://www.undemocracy.com/A-RES-50-227.pdf
Did you know that your country has been giving 0.7% of its entire GDP to some do gooding fund? Sorry, Official Development Assistance? Hmmm, did you see the usual barrage of chugger charity adverts on tv this Christmas? The usual pictures of starving children in Africa somewhere? This ODA bollocks has been going since 1970, with greater expansion in 2002. I don’t even need to do the maths on this one to tell you that 0.7% from just one country is a fuckload of money. Anyway, I’ll leave the rights and wrongs of UN economic policies for you to decipher in your own time. Nice to know that the world government has been pissing our money up the wall for over three decades.
“Yes, but what about the poor starving children?”
Why don’t you ask BP, or the UN, where the money from the ODA actually ends up being spent. And who decides what it is spent on. When you’re done reading page upon page of praise for the ODA, ask yourself why, if it’s so successful, are you still seeing walking talking skeletons in between parts 1 and 2 of your favourite soap.
In any case, whether you agree or disagree with the ODA, we have economic decisions in the bag. Onwards!
Public services and social order.
I’ll try and take these two down in one go, as I’m sure most readers with brain engaged will be getting the point already.
50/81. World Programme of Action for Youth to the
Year 2000 and Beyond
The General Assembly,Recognizing that young people in all countries are both a major human
resource for development and key agents for social change, economic
development and technological innovation,Bearing in mind that the ways in which the challenges and potentials of
young people are addressed by policy will influence current social and
economic conditions and the well-being and livelihood of future generations,Acknowledging that young women and men in all parts of the world aspire
to full participation in the life of society,Recognizing that the decade since the observance of International Youth
Year: Participation, Development and Peace has been a period of fundamental
political, economic and socio-cultural change in the world,Acknowledging the contribution that non-governmental youth organizations
could make in improving dialogue and consultations with the United Nations
system on the situation of youth,Recalling its resolution 45/103 of 14 December 1990, in which it
requested the Secretary-General to prepare a draft world youth programme of
action towards the year 2000 and beyond,Recalling also its resolution 49/152 of 23 December 1994 on the
International Youth Year, in which it requested the Commission for Social
Development at its thirty-fourth session to consider further the draft world
programme of action for youth towards the year 2000 and beyond.
Wait, I hear you ask:
“yes, yes, yes, this is all well and good but these UN resolutions don’t mean anything to me, they don’t affect me, maybe kids in Africa but not me”
Well, if that’s the case then how can it be that these so called meaningless resolutions take troops directly from your countries army, and funds directly from the pockets of your countries people?
The UN resolution quoted above specifically states “young people in all countries“.
What did the dictionary say defines government?
the political direction and control exercised over the actionsof the members,
citizens, or inhabitants of communities, societies, and states; direction of the affairs of a state,community, etc.
The decisions made by the UN directly affect every man, woman and child on this planet. From education to economic policy to trade and transport to you name them. That’s a world government boys and girls. All singing, all dancing, all powerful one world government.
Common man on the street: “Nah!! One world government? That’s just a conspiracy theory”
Wrong!
Conspiracy theorist: “One world government? Oh my god yes! It’s the New World Order don’t you know. They are planning to implement the one world government right after world war three! With aliens and reptiles and sacrificial virgins and…”
Wrong again!
If the UN tells your country it must do X, Y or Z, does your country do it?
If you peel away the political & news speak jargonballs, the answer is a wholehearted 100% yes with extra fries and milkshake.
The real question people should be asking is “who controls the UN?”
And who is above all of that lot?
The bank of banks… The elite bankers bank of choice:
”ok, ok. So what can little old me possibly do to defeat globally organised skulduggery and subversion?”
- Step one: Go to the bank(s) where you keep your money.
- Step two: Withdraw all funds from said banks.
- Step three: Never put it back.
- Step four: Find alternative monetary storage medium. Buy a safe. Buy precious metals. Keep cash and precious metals in your safe. Use as when necessary.
That’s it!
No money for banks equals no more fractional reserve scam bollocks. An end to fractional reserve would mean the start of the end of the foundations of the machine that fucks us over, even as we sleep.
There’s only one tiny catch. The above mentioned four steps would only work if we all did them together. Together we are more powerful than any corrupt banking cartel. Tucked up in separate boxes of class, race, political affiliations, religious beliefs, etc, etc, we are nothing but slaves. We are all different. But we are all the same in that we are all PEOPLE. And we are all united in the bonds of wage slavery. And, we are united in the fact that only by working together can we break the bonds of slavery. If you think that just because you drive a Ferrari and have a net worth of 6 figures that you are not included in the wage slave club, I’ve got news for you: You are a wage slave too. You just pay a higher rate of tax than the rest of us. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again… United we stand, divided we carry on the headlong rush into stress induced illnesses and hopeless escapism.
Goodnight.
Tags: alex jones, Aliens, Banks, bbc, BIS, david icke, ECB, global governance, ODA, one-world government, resolution, shill, shills, Statistical Commission, truth, united nations, World Bank, world government, WW3
